Press Releases 2004
What Happened in Haiti, by Sue M. Cobb, United States Ambassador to Jamaica
March 5, 2004
As the crisis in Haiti grew, CARICOM calmly provided a pathway
forward for the international community’s involvement. CARICOM
requested peace enforcement and peacekeeping missions under the United
Nations, and
offered a Plan of Action for the parties in conflict to find a way to
address Haiti’s constitutional crisis. In those weeks preceding the
departure of President Aristide, the United States served as a partner
with CARICOM, France, and Canada in efforts to follow the CARICOM path.
However, through those efforts it became abundantly clear that no
nation, the United States included, was inclined to send forces to
sustain the failed political status quo in Haiti.
From the series of meetings and consultations among the partners,
from decisions made (and from those not made), and from the rapidly
deteriorating conditions in Haiti, came last weekend an unmanageable
vortex and the imminent collapse of the government of Haiti. That is
when President Aristide concluded that the only path to take to prevent
massive bloodshed and innumerable casualties was to resign as
President. He made the decision to resign. He requested the help of the
United States
to leave the country and he received it. Then he called us “kidnappers”.
Those words were heard by willing ears, resulting in surprisingly
inflammatory rhetoric and an environment of hostility that I can only
call markedly disappointing and unsophisticated in analysis. I do not
take lightly the veiled assertions or the direct attacks on the
veracity and integrity of our Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and
Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega.
Cooler heads might have wished to have a better understanding of all
the facts and circumstances prior to leaping at allegations made by the
ex-president following his resignation and search for asylum.
For the record, Aristide resigned doing, in the view of many, his
only real service to the people of Haiti in a dozen years. We know that
Aristide was considered the constitutional president. But, we know
other things about Aristide, learned over the course of the last decade
of his leadership, that influenced my government’s decision making:
His use of mob violence and hit squads as a policy for several years
and his endorsement of assassinations of journalists who dared to
criticize his actions sowed the seeds of his downfall;
The very same group that rose up in Gonaives – the so-called
Cannibal army – was a central part of his own network of thugs until
six months ago;
He politicized and corrupted the Haitian National Police,
systematically driving out honest people and putting his thugs in
charge;
He failed to abide by most of the commitments he made to the international community including several OAS resolutions;
His regime distributed arms to his political supporters while the
police were left defenseless - and those armed mobs were responsible
for most of the violence in Port au Prince during the last few weeks.
Based on that spectacular track record, and after any hope of a
‘shared government’ was quashed, we made a conscious decision not to
put American lives at risk for the sole purpose of buying Aristide more
time to perpetuate such policies. I do not recall, previously in this
Hemisphere, anyone demanding that the UN or the US invade Bolivia to
keep Sanchez de Lozada in power, or in Argentina to keep DeLa Rua in
power, or in Ecuador to keep Mahuad or Bucaram in power. They resigned
for the good of their respective countries. Even Aristide’s best
friends should want him to have as his lasting legacy that he, at long
last put the interests of his people ahead of his own in his last
official act. The US made a tough decision, but I am certain it was the
right decision for Haiti’s future.
Around the world, all but Aristide’s most loyal supporters
understood that he would have to depart or Haiti would drown in
bloodshed. Those who wish to can scream
about “a coup”. When Aristide realized that the few US Marines in the
country to protect the US Embassy and personnel would not protect him,
his family and his entourage as well, he requested US assistance in
obtaining passage to safety.
US officials spent an hour and a half – during the emergency flight
out of Haiti – trying to find a
country willing to provide asylum for Aristide. It remains curious to
me that no country, including Aristide’s presumed friends, had agreed
to provide for Aristide’s safety.
Let us be clear about the future: (i) The United States has been and
will continue to be a firm supporter of democracy in Haiti; (ii)
Aristide’s departure was never a
US demand; (iii) the US government has been and will almost certainly
continue to be Haiti’s leading provider of economic aid (contrary to
some claims aid to Haiti was never cut off or suspended. Between 1995
and 2003, the US provided close to a billion dollars in assistance to
Haiti); (iv) we have helped to normalize relations with the IFIs and we
will continue to support IFI loans to Haiti based on their technical
merits; (v) the US does not recognize Guy Phillipe or his followers in
the rebel army as representatives of the political opposition in Haiti.
Faced with the realities of US Marines and other enforcers from the
United Nations, Phillipe has promised to disarm his followers. We must
ensure that this happens.
There have been meetings this week with the interim Haitian government,
the opposition and the international community. A Tripartite Council –
as called for in the original CARICOM plan - has been formed, and there
is progress toward selecting the Council of Eminent Persons to nominate
a new Prime Minister. It is now the job of diplomats and leaders to
mitigate the
real or perceived damage of disagreement or of miscommunication and to
build on every positive aspect of the relationship among nations. It is
decidedly not the job of leaders and diplomats to fan flames, seize
upon rumors, or promulgate distrust through inflammatory language and
exacerbation of a ‘north-south’ divide.
The international community should now focus on how we can work together to rebuild Haiti.